Methods and compositions for treatment of traumatic brain injury and for modulation of migration of neurogenic cells

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are methods for the treatment of traumatic brain injury by transplantation of cells descended from marrow adherent stem cells that express an exogenous Notch intracellular domain. The transplanted cells form a pathway along which endogenous neurogenic cells proliferate and migrate from the subventricular zone to the site of injury.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patentapplication No. 61/647,893, filed May 16, 2012; the specification anddrawings of which are incorporated herein by reference in theirentireties for all purposes.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERAL SUPPORT

Some of the research described herein was supported by a grant from theNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. The UnitedStates government may have certain rights in the inventions disclosedherein.

FIELD

The present disclosure is in the field of cell therapy for neurologicaldisorders.

BACKGROUND

Initially employed for in-depth examination of cell development¹, stemcells have become a cornerstone for regenerative medicine, includingcell-based therapies for treatment of neurological disorders^(2,3). Stemcells exist even in adulthood⁸, and possess the capacity to self-renewand differentiate into multiple lineages⁹, contribute to normalhomeostasis¹⁰, and exert therapeutic benefits either endogenously¹¹⁻¹⁴or following transplantation in injured organs, i.e., brain¹⁵⁻²¹. Thesubventricular zone (SVZ) of the lateral ventricles and the subgranularzone of the hippocampus dentate gyrus are the two major stem-cell nichesin the adult brain^(22,23), although quiescent neural stem cells (NSCs)have been detected in other brain regions²⁴. Induction of endogenousstem cells after injury would provide new opportunities in regenerativemedicine^(2,3,11-21).

Cells other than pluripotent stem cells have also been used in thetreatment of disorders of the central nervous system. As one example,SB623 cells (which are cells derived from marrow adherent stem cells inwhich an exogenous Notch intracellular domain has been expressed) areused for the treatment of stroke, by transplantation at or near the siteof ischemic insult. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,092,792 andYasuhara et al. (2009) Stem Cells Devel. 18:1501-1513. U.S. Pat. No.7,682,825 describes additional uses of SB623 cells in the treatment of anumber of disorders of the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Despite these scientific advances and some initial clinicalstudies²⁵⁻²⁷, a fundamental gap in our understanding of cell therapy isa knowledge of the mechanisms by which transplanted cells facilitate therepair of damaged neural tissue. To date, increased graft survival andgraft persistence have been considered the crux of successful celltransplantation therapy in affording therapeutic benefits in hematologicand non-hematologic disorders. Thus, much effort has been directed toprolonging the survival and persistence of transplanted cells.Accordingly, methods for effective cell therapy, that do not require thepersistence of large amounts of transplanted cells, would beadvantageous.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) refers to damage to the brain resultingfrom external mechanical force. TBI can result from falls, firearmwounds, sports accidents, construction accidents and vehicle accidents,among other causes. Victims of TBI can suffer from a number of physical,cognitive, social, emotional and/or behavioral disorders.

Little can be done to reverse the initial physical damage of a TBI.Therefore, treatment options consist primarily of stabilization toprevent further damage in the acute phase, and rehabilitationthereafter. Because of these limited options, additional methods andcompositions for treatment of TBI are needed.

SUMMARY

The present inventors have discovered that transplantation of SB623cells (i.e., cells derived from marrow adherent stem cells in which anexogenous Notch intracellular domain has been expressed) can be used inthe treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Animals that receivedtransplants of SB623 cells after TBI displayed significantly improvedmotor and neurological functions coupled with significantly reduceddamage to the cortical core and peri-injured cortical areas, compared totraumatically injured animals that received injection of vehicle only.

The inventors have also found that, contrary to expectations, survivaland persistence of large numbers of transplanted cells are not requiredfor the therapeutic benefits of SB623 cell transplantation.Surprisingly, therapeutic benefits can be obtained by minimum and acutegraft survival, which is sufficient to initiate a robust and stablefunctional recovery. This solves two major problems: the need for anample supply of transplantable cells and the need for long-term graftsurvival.

The inventors have also discovered that the beneficial effects of SB623cell transplantation, in the treatment of TBI, result from the formationof a biological bridge (“biobridge”) between the neurogenic niche in thesubventricular zone (SVZ) and the injured brain site. This biobridge,which has been visualized immunohistochemically and laser-captured,initially expressed high levels of extracellular matrixmetalloproteinases and was characterized by a stream of the transplantedcells. At later times after transplantation, the grafted cells werereplaced by newly formed host cells, and few-to-no transplanted cellsremained in the biobridge. Thus, the transplanted SB623 cells initiallyformed a pathway between the neurogenic SVZ and the injured cortex thatfacilitated later migration of host neurogenic cells from the neurogenicniche to the site of brain injury.

This sequence of events reveals a novel method for treatment of TBI;namely, transplantation of SB623 cells, which form transient pathwaysfor directing the migration of host neurogenic cells. That is, thetransplanted SB623 cells initially form a biobridge between a neurogenicniche and the site of injury; but once this biobridge is formed, thegrafted cells are replaced by host neurogenic cells which migrate to theinjury site. These findings reveal that long-distance migration of hostcells from a neurogenic niche to an injured brain site can be achievedthrough transplanted SB623 cells serving as biobridges for initiation ofendogenous repair mechanisms.

Accordingly, the present disclosure provides, inter alia, the followingembodiments:

1. A method for treating traumatic brain injury in a subject, the methodcomprising administering, to the brain of the subject, a therapeuticallyeffective amount of SB623 cells, wherein the SB623 cells are obtained by(a) providing a culture of marrow adherent stem cells (MSCs), (b)contacting the cell culture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprisingsequences encoding a Notch intracellular domain (NICD) wherein saidpolynucleotide does not encode a full-length Notch protein, (c)selecting cells that comprise the polynucleotide of step (b), and (d)further culturing the selected cells of step (c) in the absence ofselection.

2. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the subject is a human.

3. The method of either of embodiments 1 or 2, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.

4. Cells for transplantation into a subject for the treatment oftraumatic brain injury, wherein said cells are obtained by a processcomprising the steps of: (a) providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contactingthe cell culture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprising sequencesencoding a NICD wherein said polynucleotide does not encode afull-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise thepolynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cellsof step (c) in the absence of selection.

5. The cells of embodiment 4, wherein the subject is a human.

6. The cells of either of embodiments 4 or 5, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.

7. A method for inducing the migration of endogenous neurogenic cellsfrom a neurogenic niche to a site of brain injury, the method comprisingadministering, to the brain of a subject, a therapeutically effectiveamount of SB623 cells, wherein the SB623 cells are obtained by (a)providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contacting the cell culture of step (a)with a polynucleotide comprising sequences encoding a Notchintracellular domain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotide does not encodea full-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise thepolynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cellsof step (c) in the absence of selection.

8. The method of embodiment 7, wherein the neurogenic niche is thesubventricular zone.

9. The method of either of embodiments 7 or 8, wherein the brain injuryis a traumatic brain injury.

10. The method of any of embodiments 7-9, wherein the subject is ahuman.

11. The method of any of embodiments 7-10, wherein the MSCs are obtainedfrom a human.

12. A method for stimulating proliferation of neurogenic cells in asubject, the method comprising administering, to the brain of a subject,a therapeutically effective amount of SB623 cells, wherein the SB623cells are obtained by (a) providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contactingthe cell culture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprising sequencesencoding a Notch intracellular domain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotidedoes not encode a full-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells thatcomprise the polynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing theselected cells of step (c) in the absence of selection.

13. The method of embodiment 12, wherein the brain injury is a traumaticbrain injury.

14. The method of either of embodiments 12 or 13, wherein the subject isa human.

15. The method of any of embodiments 12-14, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.

16. A method for inducing neurogenic cells to proliferate and migrate toa site of brain injury in a subject, the method comprisingadministering, to the brain of a subject, a therapeutically effectiveamount of SB623 cells, wherein the SB623 cells are obtained by (a)providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contacting the cell culture of step (a)with a polynucleotide comprising sequences encoding a Notchintracellular domain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotide does not encodea full-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise thepolynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cellsof step (c) in the absence of selection.

17. The method of embodiment 16, wherein the brain injury is a traumaticbrain injury.

18. The method of either of embodiments 16 or 17, wherein the subject isa human.

19. The method of any of embodiments 16-18, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows results of the elevated body swing test (EBST) in rats.Values are provided for Baseline (before TBI) and for 7 days, 1 month, 2months and 3 months after TBI. The rats received either transplants ofSB623 cells (“Cells,” right-most bar in each pair) or infusion ofvehicle (“Vehicle,” left-most bar in each pair). “*” indicatesstatistical significance with a p<0.05.

FIG. 2 shows mean scores in a modified Bederson neurological examinationin rats subjected to TBI that subsequently received either transplantsof SB623 cells (“Cells”) or infusion of vehicle (“Vehicle”). Values areprovided for Baseline (before TBI) and for 7 days, 1 month, 2 months and3 months after TBI. The left-most bar in each pair represents the scorein rats infused with vehicle; the right-most bar in each pair representsthe score in rats that received transplants of SB623 cells. “*”indicates statistical significance with a p<0.05.

FIG. 3 shows mean values for the number of seconds rats were able toremain on a Rotorod apparatus. The rats were subjected to experimentalTBI and subsequently received either transplants of SB623 cells(“Cells”) or infusion of vehicle (“Vehicle”). Values are provided forBaseline (before TBI) and for 7 days, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsafter TBI. The left-most bar in each pair represents the score in ratsinfused with vehicle; the right-most bar in each pair represents thescore in rats that received transplants of SB623 cells. “*” indicatesstatistical significance with a p<0.05.

FIGS. 4A and 4B shows results of assays for damage to the cortical core(“Core”) and to the cortical region in and around the impact site(“Peri-injury”) in rats subjected to TBI. FIG. 4A shows H&E sections ofbrains from rats that received transplants of SB623 cells (panels a-d)compared to rats that received infusion of vehicle (panels a1-d1). InFIG. 4B, the results are expressed as percent lesioned area (see Example8) relative to animals subjected to TBI that received infusion ofvehicle. The left-most bar in each pair shows values for the coreregion; the right-most bar in each pair shows values for the peri-injuryregion.

FIG. 5 shows levels of Ki67-labeled cells in the subventricular zone(“SVZ”) and the cortex (“CTX”) of animals subjected to TBI that receivedtransplants of SB623 cells, compared to animals subjected to TBI thatreceived infusions of vehicle, at one month and three months after TBI.“*” indicates a statistically significant increase in the number oflabeled cell observed per high-power field (p<0.05).

FIG. 6 shows levels of nestin-labeled cells in the subventricular zone(“SVZ”) and the cortex (“CTX”) of animals subjected to TBI that receivedtransplants of SB623 cells, compared to animals subjected to TBI thatreceived infusions of vehicle, at one month and three months after TBI.“*” indicates a statistically significant increase in the number oflabeled cell observed per high-power field (p<0.05).

FIG. 7 shows levels of doublecortin-labeled cells in the corpus callosum(“CC”) and the cortex (“CTX”) of animals subjected to TBI that receivedtransplants of SB623 cells, compared to animals subjected to TBI thatreceived infusions of vehicle, at one month and three months after TBI.“*” indicates a statistically significant increase in the number oflabeled cell observed per high-power field (p<0.05).

FIG. 8 shows lytic activity in homogenates of laser-captured biobridgesfrom the brains of rats subjected to experimental TBI, at one month andthree months after TBI. Activities are expressed as optical densityunits, relative to 0.5 ng recombinant MMP-9, obtained by scanningzymographic gels. In each of the two sets of three bars, the left-mostbar represents relative activity in biobridges from rats infused withvehicle after TBI, the center bar represents relative activity inbiobridges from rats transplanted with SB623 cells after TBI, and theright-most bar represents relative activity in biobridges from control,sham-operated rats.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are methods and compositions for treatment of traumaticbrain injury (TBI). Also disclosed herein are methods and compositionsfor modulation of the migration of stem cells (e.g., neural stem cells,neuronal stem cells) in the brain.

The inventors have made the surprising discovery that the behavioral andhistological improvements resulting from cell transplantation, afterTBI, do not require large-scale graft survival or long-term graftpersistence. Indeed, only modest, acute graft survival is necessary toproduce these therapeutic benefits. Thus, the inventors have uncovered anovel method for neural repair that entails a threshold dose oftransplanted cells, which do not need to persist in the brain, and whichare capable of inducing the SVZ to generate and propel new cells to theimpacted cortical area. Accordingly, transplanting the minimum effectivedose and the acute survival of the transplanted cells are sufficient toinitiate an intricate endogenous restorative machinery for abrogating amassive brain injury.

Practice of the present disclosure employs, unless otherwise indicated,standard methods and conventional techniques in the fields of cellbiology, toxicology, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell culture,immunology, neurology, surgery, recombinant DNA and related fields asare within the skill of the art. Such techniques are described in theliterature and thereby available to those of skill in the art. See, forexample, Alberts, B. et al., “Molecular Biology of the Cell,” 5^(th)edition, Garland Science, New York, N.Y., 2008; Voet, D. et al.“Fundamentals of Biochemistry: Life at the Molecular Level,” 3^(rd)edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2008; Sambrook, J. et al.,“Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,” 3^(rd) edition, Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory Press, 2001; Ausubel, F. et al., “Current Protocols inMolecular Biology,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987 and periodicupdates; Freshney, R.I., “Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of BasicTechnique,” 4^(th) edition, John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, N.J., 2000; andthe series “Methods in Enzymology,” Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

Marrow Adherent Stem Cells (MSCs)

The present disclosure provides methods for treating TBI and modulatingstem cell migration by transplanting SB623 cells to a site of braininjury in a subject. SB623 cells are obtained from marrow adherent stemcells (MSCs), also known as marrow adherent stromal cells andmesenchymal stem cells, by expressing the intracellular domain of theNotch protein in the MSCs. MSCs are obtained by selecting adherent cells(i.e., cells that adhere to tissue culture plastic) from bone marrow.

Exemplary disclosures of MSCs are provided in U.S. patent applicationpublication No. 2003/0003090; Prockop (1997) Science 276:71-74 and Jiang(2002) Nature 418:41-49. Methods for the isolation and purification ofMSCs can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,359; Pittenger etal. (1999) Science 284:143-147 and Dezawa et al. (2001) Eur. J.Neurosci. 14:1771-1776. Human MSCs are commercially available (e.g.,BioWhittaker, Walkersville, Md.) or can be obtained from donors by,e.g., bone marrow aspiration, followed by selection for adherent bonemarrow cells. See, e.g., WO 2005/100552.

MSCs can also be isolated from umbilical cord blood. See, for example,Campagnoli et al. (2001) Blood 98:2396-2402; Erices et al. (2000)Br. J.Haematol. 109:235-242 and Hou et al. (2003) Int. J. Hematol. 78:256-261.Additional sources of MSCs include, for example, menstrual blood andplacenta.

Notch Intracellular Domain

The Notch protein is a transmembrane receptor, found in all metazoans,that influences cell differentiation through intracellular signaling.Contact of the Notch extracellular domain with a Notch ligand (e.g.,Delta, Serrate, Jagged) results in two proteolytic cleavages of theNotch protein, the second of which is catalyzed by a γ-secretase andreleases the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) into the cytoplasm. Inthe mouse Notch protein, this cleavage occurs between amino acidsgly1743 and val1744. The NICD translocates to the nucleus, where it actsas a transcription factor, recruiting additional transcriptionalregulatory proteins (e.g., MAM, histone acetylases) to relievetranscriptional repression of various target genes (e.g., Hes 1).

Additional details and information regarding Notch signaling are found,for example in Artavanis-Tsakonas et al. (1995) Science 268:225-232;Mumm and Kopan (2000) Develop. Biol. 228:151-165 and Ehebauer et al.(2006) Sci. STKE 2006 (364), cm7. [DOI: 10.1126/stke.3642006 cm7].

Cell Culture and Transfection

Standard methods for cell culture are known in the art. See, forexample, R. I. Freshney “Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of BasicTechnique,” Fifth Edition, Wiley, New York, 2005.

Methods for introduction of exogenous DNA into cells (i.e.,transfection), and methods for selection of cells comprising exogenousDNA, are also well-known in the art. See, for example, Sambrook et al.“Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,” Third Edition, Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory Press, 2001; Ausubel et al., “Current Protocols inMolecular Biology,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987 and periodicupdates.

SB623 Cells

In one embodiment for the preparation of SB623 cells, a culture of MSCsis contacted with a polynucleotide comprising sequences encoding a Notchintracellular domain (NICD); e.g., by transfection; followed byenrichment of transfected cells by drug selection and further culture.See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,682,825 (Mar. 23, 2010); U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2010/0266554 (Oct. 21, 2010); and WO2009/023251 (Feb. 19, 2009); all of which disclosures are incorporatedby reference, in their entireties, for the purposes of describingisolation of marrow adherent stem cells and conversion of marrowadherent stem cells to SB623 cells (denoted “neural precursor cells” and“neural regenerating cells” in those documents).

In these methods, any polynucleotide encoding a Notch intracellulardomain (e.g., vector) can be used, and any method for the selection andenrichment of transfected cells can be used. For example, in certainembodiments, MSCs are transfected with a vector containing sequencesencoding a Notch intracellular domain and also containing sequencesencoding a drug resistance marker (e.g. resistance to G418). Inadditional embodiments, two vectors, one containing sequences encoding aNotch intracellular domain and the other containing sequences encoding adrug resistance marker, are used for transfection of MSCs. In theseembodiments, selection is achieved, after transfection of a cell culturewith the vector or vectors, by adding a selective agent (e.g., G418) tothe cell culture in an amount sufficient to kill cells that do notcomprise the vector but spare cells that do. Absence of selectionentails removal of said selective agent or reduction of itsconcentration to a level that does not kill cells that do not comprisethe vector. Following selection (e.g., for seven days) the selectiveagent is removed and the cells are further cultured (e.g., for twopassages).

Preparation of SB623 cells thus involves transient expression of anexogenous Notch intracellular domain in a MSC. To this end, MSCs can betransfected with a vector comprising sequences encoding a Notchintracellular domain wherein said sequences do not encode a full-lengthNotch protein. All such sequences are well known and readily availableto those of skill in the art. For example, Del Amo et al. (1993)Genomics 15:259-264 present the complete amino acid sequences of themouse Notch protein; while Mumm and Kopan (2000) Devel. Biol.228:151-165 provide the amino acid sequence, from mouse Notch protein,surrounding the so-called S3 cleavage site which releases theintracellular domain. Taken together, these references provide theskilled artisan with each and every peptide containing a Notchintracellular domain that is not the full-length Notch protein; therebyalso providing the skilled artisan with every polynucleotide comprisingsequences encoding a Notch intracellular domain that does not encode afull-length Notch protein. The foregoing documents (Del Amo and Mumm)are incorporated by reference in their entireties for the purpose ofdisclosing the amino acid sequence of the full-length Notch protein andthe amino acid sequence of the Notch intracellular domain, respectively.

Similar information is available for Notch proteins and nucleic acidsfrom additional species, including rat, Xenopus, Drosophila and human.See, for example, Weinmaster et al. (1991) Development 113:199-205;Schroeter et al. (1998) Nature 393:382-386; NCBI Reference Sequence No.NM_(—)017167 (and references cited therein); SwissProt P46531 (andreferences cited therein); SwissProt Q01705 (and references citedtherein); and GenBank CAB40733 (and references cited therein). Theforegoing references are incorporated by reference in their entiretiesfor the purpose of disclosing the amino acid sequence of the full-lengthNotch protein and the amino acid sequence of the Notch intracellulardomain in a number of different species.

In additional embodiments, SB623 cells are prepared by introducing, intoMSCs, a nucleic acid comprising sequences encoding a Notch intracellulardomain such that the MSCs do not express exogenous Notch extracellulardomain. Such can be accomplished, for example, by transfecting MSCs witha vector comprising sequences encoding a Notch intracellular domainwherein said sequences do not encode a full-length Notch protein.

Additional details on the preparation of SB623 cells, and methods formaking cells with properties similar to those of SB623 cells which canbe used in the methods disclosed herein, are found in U.S. Pat. No.7,682,825; U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,725; and U.S. Patent ApplicationPublication Nos. 2010/0266554 and 2011/0229442; the disclosures of whichare incorporated by reference herein for the purposes of providingadditional details on, and alternative methods for the preparation of,SB623 cells, and for providing methods for making cells with propertiessimilar to those of SB623 cells. See also Dezawa et al. (2004) J. Clin.Invest. 113:1701-1710.

Reversal of Symptoms of TBI by Transplantation of SB623 Cells

The efficacy of SB623 cell transplantation as a treatment for TBI wastested in a rat model system. Prior to testing, adult maleSprague-Dawley rats (8-weeks old) were evaluated in motor andneurological tests (all performed by two investigators blinded to thetreatment condition throughout the study) to confirm that all animalsdisplayed normal behaviors at baseline (i.e., prior to brain insult).Animals were then exposed to experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI),and seven days later were subjected to the same behavioral tests toconfirm the typical TBI-induced motor and neurological impairments.Following these tests (at 7 days post-TBI), the animals were assignedrandomly to one of two groups to receive either stereotaxic transplantsof Notch-induced bone marrow-derived stem cells (SB623 cells)^(26,29) orvehicle infusion into the cortex (see Example 3).

The inventors have found that, at both one month and three monthspost-TBI, traumatically injured animals that received transplants ofSB623 cells displayed significantly improved motor and neurologicalfunctions, coupled with significantly reduced damage to the corticalcore and peri-injured cortical areas, compared to traumatically injuredanimals that received vehicle only (see Examples). These behavioral andphysical improvements were achieved with modest graft survival of 0.60%and 0.16% at one month and three months post-TBI, respectively. Othersites in the brain that are affected by TBI include the striatum and thehippocampus; hence transplantation of SB623 cells to the striatum andthe hippocampus can also be used for treatment of TBI affecting theseareas. In summary, transplantation of SB623 cells into brain-injuredanimals provided robust functional recovery despite lack of graftpersistence.

Creation of a Biobridge by Transplantation of SB623 Cells

Examination of host tissue in brain-injured animals that had receivedtransplants of SB623 cells, at one month post-TBI, revealed a surge ofendogenous cell proliferation (detected by Ki67 expression) anddifferentiation of neurogenic cells (detected by expression of nestin)in the peri-injured cortical areas and subventricular zone (SVZ). Astream of cells (expressing doublecortin) migrating along the corpuscallosum (CC) of these animals was also detected. In contrast, animalssubjected to experimental TBI that received vehicle alone displayedlimited cell proliferation, little neural differentiation, and onlyscattered migration in the peri-injured cortical areas. In addition,very few newly-formed cells were visible in the sub-ventricular zone ofthese control animals (see Examples).

At three months post-TBI, the brains from animals that had receivedSB623 cell transplants exhibited much higher levels of cellproliferation and neural differentiation encasing the peri-injuredcortical areas, along with a solid stream of neuronal cells (expressingboth nestin and doublecortin) migrating not just along but across the CCfrom the SVZ to the impacted cortex. Brains from injured animals thathad received only vehicle exhibited much more elevated levels of cellproliferation at three months post-TBI than at one month post-TBI, butthe newly-formed cells appeared “trapped” within the SVZ and the corpuscallosum; with only a small number of cells able to reach the impactedcortex. Quantitative analysis of Ki67, nestin and doublecortinimmunoreactivity in the SVZ, the CC, and the injured cortical areaindicated that the differences in expression of these markers, betweenanimals receiving SB623 cell transplants and animals receiving onlyvehicle, were statistically significant.

In a separate experiment, the biobridge formed by endogenous cellsmigrating from the SVZ to the site of injury was isolated by lasercapture microdissection (Espina et al. (2006) Nature Protoc. 1:586-603)and its zymogenic properties were analyzed. In this experiment, threegroups of animals were analyzed: (1) animals subjected to TBI followedby transplantation of SB623 cells at 7 days post-TBI, (2) animalssubjected to TBI followed by infusion of vehicle at 7 days post-TBI, and(3) control sham-operated age-matched adult Sprague-Dawley rats (n=3 pergroup). Zymographic assays of the laser-captured biobridges from animalssubjected to TBI revealed two-fold and nine-fold upregulation of matrixmetalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression/activity in animals that receivedSB623 cell transplants, compared to vehicle-infused animals orsham-operated animals, at one month and three monthspost-transplantation, respectively (Example 11).

MMPs have been implicated in recovery in chronic brain injury²⁹, andinhibition of MMP activity has been shown to abrogate migration ofneurogenic cells from the SVZ into damaged tissues and to retardneurovascular remodeling³⁰. MMPs may thus play a role in facilitatinghost cell migration towards injured brain areas as part of the processby which SB623 cells provide functional recovery from TBI.

In summary, the inventors have discovered that transplantation of SB623cells remodeled the traumatically injured brain by creating a biobridgebetween the SVZ and the peri-injured cortex. This method of cell therapycan now be used to create similar biobridges between neurogenic andnon-neurogenic sites, to facilitate injury-specific migration of cellsacross tissues that might otherwise pose barriers to cell motility.

Formulations, Kits and Routes of Administration

Therapeutic compositions comprising SB623 cells as disclosed herein arealso provided. Such compositions typically comprise the SB623 cells anda pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Supplementary active compoundscan also be incorporated into SB623 cell compositions.

The therapeutic compositions disclosed herein are useful for, interalia, treating TBI and modulating stem cell migration in the brain.Accordingly, a “therapeutically effective amount” of a compositioncomprising SB623 cells is any amount that reduces symptoms of TBI orthat stimulates migration of stem cells in the brain. For example,dosage amounts can vary from about 100; 500; 1,000; 2,500; 5,000;10,000; 20,000; 50,000; 100,000; 300,000; 500,000; 1,000,000; 5,000,000to 10,000,000 cells or more (or any integral value therebetween); with afrequency of administration of, e.g., once per day, twice per week, onceper week, twice per month, once per month, depending upon, e.g., bodyweight, route of administration, severity of disease, etc. Thus, atherapeutically effective amount can comprise a plurality ofadministrations of the same amount, or different amounts, of SB623cells. In certain embodiments, a single administration of SB623 cells isa therapeutically effective amount.

Various pharmaceutical compositions and techniques for their preparationand use are known to those of skill in the art in light of the presentdisclosure. For a detailed listing of suitable pharmacologicalcompositions and techniques for their administration one may refer totexts such as Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 17th ed. 1985;Brunton et al., “Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis ofTherapeutics,” McGraw-Hill, 2005; University of the Sciences inPhiladelphia (eds.), “Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy,”Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005; and University of the Sciences inPhiladelphia (eds.), “Remington: The Principles of Pharmacy Practice,”Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

The cells described herein may be suspended in a physiologicallycompatible carrier for transplantation. As used herein, the term“physiologically compatible carrier” refers to a carrier that iscompatible with the SB623 cells and with any other ingredients of theformulation, and is not deleterious to the recipient thereof. Those ofskill in the art are familiar with physiologically compatible carriers.Examples of suitable carriers include cell culture medium (e.g., Eagle'sminimal essential medium), phosphate buffered saline, Hank's balancedsalt solution+/−glucose (HBSS), and multiple electrolyte solutions suchas, e.g., Plasma-Lyte™ A (Baxter).

The volume of a SB623 cell suspension administered to a subject willvary depending on the site of transplantation, treatment goal and numberof cells in solution. Typically the amount of cells administered will bea therapeutically effective amount. As used herein, a “therapeuticallyeffective amount” or “effective amount” refers to the number oftransplanted cells which are required to effect treatment of theparticular disorder; i.e., to produce a reduction in the amount and/orseverity of the symptoms associated with that disorder. For example, inthe case of TBI, transplantation of a therapeutically effective amountof SB623 cells results in reduction and/or reversal of the symptoms ofTBI; e.g., restoration of locomotor activity and neurologicalperformance, and stimulation of migration of host neurogenic cells.Therapeutically effective amounts vary with the type and extent of braindamage, and can also vary depending on the overall condition of thesubject.

The disclosed therapeutic compositions can also include pharmaceuticallyacceptable materials, compositions or vehicle, such as a liquid or solidfiller, diluent, excipient, solvent or encapsulating material, i.e.,carriers. These carriers can, for example, stabilize the SB623 cellsand/or facilitate the survival of the SB623 cells in the body. Eachcarrier should be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with theother ingredients of the formulation and not injurious to the subject.Some examples of materials which can serve aspharmaceutically-acceptable carriers include: sugars, such as lactose,glucose and sucrose; starches, such as corn starch and potato starch;cellulose and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose,ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate; powdered tragacanth; malt;gelatin; talc; excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes;oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil,olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; glycols, such as propylene glycol;polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol;esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; agar; buffering agents,such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; alginic acid;pyrogen-free water; isotonic saline; Ringer's solution; ethyl alcohol;phosphate buffer solutions; and other non-toxic compatible substancesemployed in pharmaceutical formulations. Wetting agents, emulsifiers andlubricants, such as sodium lauryl sulfate and magnesium stearate, aswell as coloring agents, release agents, coating agents, sweetening,flavoring and perfuming agents, preservatives and antioxidants can alsobe present in the compositions.

Exemplary formulations include, but are not limited to, those suitablefor parenteral administration, e.g., intrapulmonary, intravenous,intra-arterial, intra-ocular, intra-cranial, sub-meningial, orsubcutaneous administration, including formulations encapsulated inmicelles, liposomes or drug-release capsules (active agents incorporatedwithin a biocompatible coating designed for slow-release); ingestibleformulations; formulations for topical use, such as eye drops, creams,ointments and gels; and other formulations such as inhalants, aerosolsand sprays. The dosage of the compositions of the disclosure will varyaccording to the extent and severity of the need for treatment, theactivity of the administered composition, the general health of thesubject, and other considerations well known to the skilled artisan.

In additional embodiments, the compositions described herein aredelivered intracranially at or near a site of traumatic brain injury.Such localized delivery allows for the delivery of the compositionnon-systemically, thereby reducing the body burden of the composition ascompared to systemic delivery. Local delivery can be achieved, forexample, by intra-cranial injection, or through the use of variousmedically implanted devices including, but not limited to, stents andcatheters, or can be achieved by inhalation, phlebotomy, or surgery.Methods for coating, implanting, embedding, and otherwise attachingdesired agents to medical devices such as stents and catheters areestablished in the art and contemplated herein.

Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to kits for carryingout the administration of SB623 cells, optionally in combination withanother therapeutic agent, to a subject. In one embodiment, a kitcomprises a composition of SB623 cells, formulated in a pharmaceuticalcarrier, suitable for transplantation.

EXAMPLES

In the studies disclosed herein, rats were subjected to experimentaltraumatic brain injury (TBI) and, seven days later, those havingsufficient locomotor and neurological deficits received transplants ofeither SB623 cells or vehicle to the injured area. Values of locomotorand neurological performance were evaluated prior to TBI (baselinevalues), again at 7 days after TBI (prior to transplantation), andmonthly thereafter for 3 months after TBI.

Following completion of behavioral testing at 1 month and 3 months afterTBI, randomly selected animals were euthanized (n=10 per group) bytranscardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde. Their brains wereremoved and sectioned for evaluation of persistence of the transplantedcells, histological appearance of brain tissue in and around the injuredarea, expression of various neural markers in and around the injuredarea, and zymogenic activity in and around the injured area.

Transplant outcomes were evaluated using the following criteria: 1)locomotor behavior via elevated body swing test (EBST) and Rotorod; (2)neurological performance via a Bederson-modified neurologicalexamination; 3) lesion volume via histology (H&E stained sections); 4)graft survival via immunohistochemistry using an antibody (HuNu) thatspecifically detects human cells, and; 5) mechanism-basedimmunohistochemial analyses of neuroprotection and/or regeneration usingantibodies directed against the grafted human cells and host cells.

Example 1 Preparation of MSCs and SB623 Cells

Bone marrow aspirates from adult human donors were obtained from LonzaWalkersville, Inc. (Walkersville, Md.) and plated in α-MEM (Mediatech,Herndon, Va.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan,Utah), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) andpenicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). Cells were cultured for three daysat 37° C. and 5% CO₂, to obtain a monolayer of adherent cells. Afterremoval of non-adherent cells, culture was continued under the sameconditions for two weeks. During this time, cells were passaged twice,using 0.25% trypsin/EDTA. A portion of the cells from the second passagewere frozen as MSCs.

The remaining cells from the second passage were plated and transfected,using Fugene6 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.), with a plasmidcontaining sequences encoding a Notch intracellular domain operativelylinked to a cytomegalovirus promoter (pCMV-hNICD1-SV40-Neo^(R)). Thisplasmid also contained sequences encoding resistance to neomycin andG418 under the transcriptional control of a SV40 promoter. Transfectedcells were cultured at 37° C. and 5% CO₂ in the growth medium describedin the previous paragraph, supplemented with 100 μg/ml G418 (Invitrogen,Carlsbad, Calif.). After seven days, G418-resistant colonies wereexpanded and the culture was passaged twice. After the second passage,the cells were collected and frozen as SB623 cells.

MSCs and SB623 cells prepared as described herein were thawed asrequired and used for further study.

Example 2 Induction of TBI in a Rat Model

A total of 40 animals identified at baseline (prior to TBI surgery) asexhibiting normal behaviors (50-60% bias swing activity in EBST; 60seconds staying time on Rotorod; and a mean Bederson score of at most0-0.5), received TBI surgery as described below.

All surgical procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions. Adultmale Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with 1.5% isofluorane andchecked for pain reflexes. Under deep anesthesia, animals underwent amoderate TBI model, as follows. Each animal was placed in a stereotaxicframe, with anesthesia being maintained with 1-2% isofluoraneadministered via a gas mask. After exposing the skull, a 4-mmcraniectomy was performed over the left frontoparietal cortex, with itscenter at −2.0 mm AP and +2.0 mm ML to the bregma. A pneumaticallyoperated metal impactor, with a diameter of 3 mm, was used to impact thebrain at a velocity of 6.0 m/s, reaching a depth of 1.0 mm below thedura mater layer and remaining in the brain for 150 milliseconds. Theimpactor rod was angled 15° to the vertical, so as to be perpendicularto the tangential plane of the brain surface at the impact site. Alinear variable displacement transducer (Macrosensors, Pennsauken, N.J.)connected to the impactor was used to measure velocity and duration, toverify consistency.

Subsequent to controlled cortical impact injury, the incision wassutured after bleeding ceased. An integrated heating pad and rectalthermometer unit with feedback control allowed maintenance of bodytemperature at normal limits. All animals were monitored until recoveryfrom anesthesia. In addition, animals were weighed and observed dailyfor three consecutive days following induction of TBI, weighed twice aweek thereafter, and monitored daily throughout the study for healthstatus and any signs that indicated problems or complications.

Example 3 Grafting of SB623 Cells

Of the animals subjected to TBI, only those having the following degreeof behavioral impairment at Day 7 post-TBI were selected fortransplantation studies: at least 75% bias swing activity in the EBST;30 seconds or less staying time on the Rotorod; and a mean Bedersonscore of at least 2.5. Those animals that were selected were randomlyassigned either to a group receiving SB623 transplants (n=20) or to agroup receiving vehicle infusion (n=20). The target area fortransplantation was the medial cortex, which corresponded to theperi-injured cortical area based on previously established target sitesfor similar stereotaxic implants.

All surgical procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions. Animalswere anesthetized with 1.5% isofluorane and checked for pain reflexes.Once deep anesthesia was achieved (as determined by the loss of painreflex), the hair was shaved around the area of the surgical incision(skull area), leaving enough border to prevent contamination of theoperative site. This was followed by two surgical germicidal scrubs ofthe site, and draping with sterile drapes.

The animal was then fixed to a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments,Tujunga, Calif.), and a small opening was made in the skull with a burr.The coordinates of the opening were 0.5 mm anterior and 1.0 mm lateralto the bregma and 2.0 mm below the dural surface; these were selected tocorrespond to the cortical area adjacent to the core injury site, basedon the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1998). A 26-gauge Hamilton syringe,containing test material, was then lowered into the opening. With asingle needle pass, 3 deposits of 3 ul each were made. Each depositconsisted of 100,000 viable cells in 3 ul of Plasmalyte A, infused overa period of 3 minutes. Following an additional 2-minute absorption time,the needle was retracted and the wound was closed with a stainless steelwound clip. A heating pad and a rectal thermometer allowed maintenanceof body temperature at about 37° C. throughout surgery and followingrecovery from anesthesia. Control injections contained Plasmalyte Aonly.

Treated and control animals were subjected to elevated body swing test(EBST, Example 4), neurological examination (Example 5), and the Rotorodtest (Example 6) at baseline (prior to TBI), at 7 days after TBI (justprior to transplantation) and monthly thereafter up to 3 monthspost-TBI.

In addition, brains of treated and control animals were characterizedhistologically at one and three months post-TBI to determine degree ofdamage (Examples 8 and 9); the extent of proliferation, migration andneural differentiation of host cells (Example 10); and the presence ofzymogenic activity (Example 11).

Example 4 Elevated Body Swing Test (EBST)

All investigators testing the animals were blinded to the treatmentcondition. The EBST was conducted by handling the animal by its tail andrecording the direction in which the animal swung its head. The testapparatus consisted of a clear Plexiglas box (40×40×35.5 cm). The animalwas gently picked up at the base of the tail, and elevated by the tailuntil the animal's nose was at a height of 2 inches (5 cm) above thesurface. The direction of the swing (left or right) was recorded oncethe animal's head moved sideways approximately 10 degrees from themidline position of the body. After a single swing, the animal wasplaced back in the Plexiglas box and allowed to move freely for 30seconds prior to retesting. These steps were repeated for a total of 20assays for each animal. Uninjured rats display a 50% swing bias, thatis, the same number of swings to the left and to the right. A 75% swingbias indicated 15 swings in one direction and 5 in the other during 20trials. Previous results utilizing the EBST have indicated thatunilaterally lesioned animals display >75% biased swing activity at onemonth after a nigrostriatal lesion or unilateral hemispheric injury; andthat such asymmetry is stable for up to six months^(3,26).

The results of the EBST are shown in FIG. 1. After TBI, essentially allanimals exhibited biased swing activity. In animals transplanted withSB623 cells, biased swing activity steadily decreased over thethree-month period following TBI and transplantation. By contrast, inanimals transplanted with vehicle, the percentage of animals exhibitingbiased swing activity after TBI remained essentially unchanged.

Example 5 Modified Bederson Neurological Examination

About one hour after conclusion of the EBST, a modifiedBederson-Neurological exam was conducted, following the procedurespreviously described^(3,26) with minor modifications. Neurologic scorefor each rat was obtained using 3 tests which included (1) forelimbretraction, which measured the ability of the animal to replace theforelimb after it was displaced laterally by 2 to 3 cm, graded from 0(immediate replacement) to 3 (replacement after several seconds or noreplacement); (2) beam walking ability, graded 0 for a rat that readilytraversed a 2.4-cm-wide, 80-cm-long beam to 3 for a rat unable to stayon the beam for 10 seconds; and (3) bilateral forepaw grasp, whichmeasured the ability to hold onto a 2-mm-diameter steel rod, graded 0for a rat with normal forepaw grasping behavior to 3 for a rat unable tograsp with the forepaws. The scores from all 3 tests, which wereconducted over a period of about 15 minutes on each assessment day, wereadded to give a mean neurologic deficit score (maximum possible score, 9points divided by 3 tests=3).

The results of these neurological examinations are shown in FIG. 2.After TBI, the mean neurological score was 2.5 (out of 3) in allanimals. In animals transplanted with SB623 cells, this score wassteadily reduced (indicating improved neurological function) over thethree-month period following TBI and transplantation. Improvement ofneurological function in animals transplanted with SB623 cells wasstatistically significant (p<0.05) compared to animals that had beeninfused with vehicle.

Example 6 Rotorod Test

One hour after completion of the neurological exam, the animals weresubjected to the Rotorod® test. This test involved placement of theanimal on a rotating treadmill that accelerates from 4 rpm to 40 rpmover a 60-second period (Rotorod®, Accuscan, Inc., Columbus, Ohio). Thetotal number of seconds an animal was able to remain on the treadmillwas recorded and used as an index of motor coordination. Previousresults using a TBI model system have shown that injured animals wereable to remain on the Rotorod for significantly shorter times, comparedto sham-operated or normal controls.

The results of this assay are shown in FIG. 3. Uninjured animals wereable to remain on the treadmill for an average of 60 seconds. The meantime on the treadmill fell to below 20 seconds seven days after TBI. Inanimals transplanted with SB623 cells after TBI, mean time on thetreadmill doubled to approximately 40 seconds. These improvements werestatistically significant compared to animals subjected to TBI that hadbeen infused with vehicle.

Example 7 Perfusion and Sectioning

At 1 month and 3 months after TBI, following completion of behavioraltesting as described in Examples 4-6, randomly-selected rats wereeuthanized (n=10 per group) by transcardial perfusion with 4%paraformaldehyde. The brains were dissected, post-fixed overnight in 4%paraformaldehyde, then immersed in 30% sucrose. Beginning at bregma-5.2mm anteriorly, each forebrain was cut into 40 um coronal sections,moving posteriorly until bregma-8.8 mm. Sections were processed fordeterminations of brain damage and analysis of cell survival in theperi-lesion area as described in Examples 8 and 9.

Example 8 Measurement of Brain Damage

Preparation and examination of brain sections was undertaken to identifythe extent of brain damage and host cell survival. At least 4 coronaltissue sections per brain were processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)or Nissl staining Cerebral damage was quantitated by determining theindirect lesion area, which was calculated by subtracting the intactarea of the ipsilateral hemisphere from the area of the contralateralhemisphere. The lesion volume was presented as a volume percentage ofthe lesion compared to the contralateral hemisphere, by summing lesionareas from serial sections.

The results, shown quantitatively in FIG. 4B, indicate that animalssubjected to TBI that received transplants of SB623 cells experiencedsignificantly less damage to the cortical core and the peri-injuredcortical areas, compared to animals subjected to TBI that receivedinfusion of vehicle.

Example 9 Analysis of Cell Survival in the peri-TBI Lesion Area

Randomly selected high power fields, corresponding to the peri-injuredcortical area, were examined to count surviving host cells in thisregion. Results are shown in FIG. 4A.

Example 10 Immunohistochemistry

Floating sections were processed for immunofluorescent microscopy.Briefly, 40 μm cryostat sectioned tissues were examined at 4×magnification and digitized using a PC-based Image Tools computerprogram. Engraftment of transplanted SB623 cells was assessed usingmonoclonal human specific antibody HuNu that did not cross-react withrodent proteins. Additional brain sections were processed formechanism-based immunohistochemical analyses of brain tissue samplesfocusing on cell proliferation (Ki67), migration (doublecortin or DCX)and neural differentiation (nestin). Brain sections were blind-coded andAbercrombie's formula was used to calculate the total number ofimmunopositive cells^(3,26).

The results of these analyses showed that transplantation of SB623 cellsinduced formation of a biobridge between the SVZ and the impacted cortexconsisting of highly proliferative, neurally committed and migratorycells. At one month post-TBI, immunofluorescent and confocal microscopyrevealed a surge of endogenous cell proliferation (evidenced by cellsexpressing Ki67) and immature neural differentiation (cells expressingnestin) in the peri-injured cortical areas and subventricular zone(SVZ), with a stream of migrating cells (cells expressing doublecortin)along the corpus callosum (CC) of the animals that had receivedtransplants of SB623 cells. Brains from animals that had receivedvehicle alone displayed limited cell proliferation and neuraldifferentiation, and scattered migration in the peri-injured corticalareas, with almost no newly formed cells present in the SVZ. At threemonths post-TBI, the brains from SB623-transplanted animals exhibitedmuch more massive cell proliferation and neural differentiation encasingthe peri-injured cortical areas, accompanied by a solid stream ofneuronally labeled cells (expressing both nestin and doublecortin)migrating, not just along, but across the CC from the SVZ to theimpacted cortex. By contrast, in brains from vehicle-infused animals,cell proliferation was enhanced, but the newly formed cells were“trapped” within the SVZ and the CC and only a few cells were able toreach the impacted cortex. Quantitative analyses of Ki67, nestin and DCXimmunolabeled cells in SVZ, CC and CTX revealed statisticallysignificant differences between transplanted and vehicle-infused animals(FIGS. 5-7).

Example 11 Zymography

A separate cohort of animals from that whose analysis was described inExamples 4-10 was used to test for the presence and/or activity ofproteolytic enzymes after transplantation of SB623 cells into injuredbrain. Rats were subjected to TBI, then transplanted with either SB623cells or vehicle. A control group of age-matched sham-operated adultSprague-Dawley rats was subjected to the same experimental procedure(n=3 rats per group). At one month and three months after TBI, tissuecorresponding to the biobridge formed by the cells migrating from theSVZ to the impacted cortex was obtained by laser dissection. Afterextraction, the tissue was placed in cryotubes and flash frozen inliquid nitrogen. The tubes were stored in a −80° C. freezer untilhomogenization.

Samples were homogenized in 450 μL of cold working buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 75 mM NaCl, and 1 mM PMSF. The tissue wasprocessed with a homogenizer for 10 minutes and centrifuged at 4° C. for20 minutes at 13000 rpm. The supernatants were separated, frozen andkept at −80° C. until use. The total protein concentration in thesupernatant was assessed by the Bradford method.

On the day that zymography was conducted, a volume equivalent to 50 μgof total protein was loaded into a freshly prepared gelatin zymographygel. All gels contained a control lane that was loaded with 0.5 ngrecombinant MMP-9, which was used as a standard for both enzyme amount(in ng) and gelatinolytic activity (expressed as relative opticaldensity units, see below). Proteins were electrophoretically separatedin the gel under non-reducing conditions at 100 V. After electrophoresisthe gels were washed in 125 ml 2.5% Triton twice for 20 minutes. Thegels were then incubated in activation buffer (Zymogram DevelopmentBuffer, Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) for 20 hours at 37° C. The next day,the gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250 Staining Solution(Bio-Rad) for 3 hours and destained for 25 minutes with Destain Solution(Bio-Rad). The gelatinolytic activity of the samples was assessed bydensitometric analysis (Gel-Pro v 3.1, Media Cybernetics, Carlsbad,Calif.) of the bands. The molecular weights of proteins in regions ofthe gel exhibiting lytic activity were determined by comparison topre-stained standard protein marker (Bio-Rad) run on the same gel.Activity was expressed as optical density relative to that of 0.5 ng ofrecombinant MMP-9, which was run in the gel as a standard.

The results are shown in FIG. 8. The laser-captured biobridges(corresponding to brain tissue between the SVZ and the impacted cortex)from animals transplanted with SB623 cells after TBI expressed highlevels of MMP-9 gelatinolytic activity at one month and three monthspost-TBI. The levels in SB623-treated animals were significantly higherthan those in biobridges from vehicle-infused and sham-operated animals(p<0.05) at both time points. Although biobridges from vehicle-infusedanimals showed a significant increase in MMP-9 activity compared tosham-operated animals at one month post-TBI, these levels reverted tocontrol levels (i.e., not significantly different from those ofsham-operated animals) at three months post-TBI.

For detection on blots, membranes were blocked with blotting gradenon-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad). After washing with 0.1% tween20-tris-buffered saline (TTBS), the membranes were incubated with 1ug/ml anti MMP-9 monoclonal mouse antibody overnight at 4° C. Membraneswere washed again in TTBS, incubated with secondary antibody (1:1,000dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG,Calbiochem) for one hour and finally developed with horseradishperoxidase development solution (ECL advance detection kit, Amersham).The membranes were exposed to autoradiography films (Hyblot CL, DenvilleScientific Inc.). The density of the sample bands for the zymograms wasexpressed as maximal optical density relative to the standard band (0.5ng recombinant MMP-9).

REFERENCES

-   1. Joyner, A. L. et al. Production of a mutation in mouse En-2 gene    by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature 338,    153-156 (1989)-   2. Yasuhara, T. et al. Transplantation of human neural stem cells    exerts neuroprotection in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. J.    Neurosci. 26, 12497-12511 (2006)-   3. Yasuhara, T. et al. Intravenous grafts recapitulate the    neurorestoration afforded by intracerebrally delivered multipotent    adult progenitor cells in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic rats. J. Cereb.    Blood Flow Metab. 28, 1804-1810 (2008)-   4. Borlongan, C. V. et al. Central nervous system entry of    peripherally injected umbilical cord blood cells is not required for    neuroprotection in stroke. Stroke 35, 2385-2389 (2004)-   5. Pastori, C. et al. Arterially perfused neurosphere-derived cells    distribute outside the ischemic core in a model of transient focal    ischemia and reperfusion in vitro. PLoS One 3, e2754 (2008)-   6. Redmond, D. E. Jr. et al. Behavioral improvement in a primate    Parkinson's model is associated with multiple homeostatic effects of    human neural stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104,    12175-12180 (2007)-   7. Lee, J. P. et al. Stem cells act through multiple mechanisms to    benefit mice with neurodegenerative metabolic disease. Nat. Med. 13,    439-447 (2007)-   8. Ma, D. K. et al. Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the    adult mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1338-1344 (2010)-   9. Hong, S. H. et al. Cell fate potential of human pluripotent stem    cells is encoded by histone modifications. Cell Stem Cell. 9, 24-36    (2011)-   10. Kim, Y. et al. Mouse B-type lamins are required for proper    organogenesis but not by embryonic stem cells. Science. 334,    1706-1710 (2011)-   11. Borlongan, C. V. Bone marrow stem cell mobilization in stroke: a    ‘bonehead’ may be good after all! Leukemia 25, 1674-1686 (2011)-   12. Barha, C. K. et al. Progesterone treatment normalizes the levels    of cell proliferation and cell death in the dentate gyms of the    hippocampus after traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 231, 72-81    (2011)-   13. Jaskelioff, M. et al. Telomerase reactivation reverses tissue    degeneration in aged telomerase-deficient mice. Nature 469, 102-106    (2011)-   14. Wang, L. et al. Tumor necrosis factor α primes cerebral    endothelial cells for erythropoietin-induced angiogenesis. J. Cereb.    Blood Flow Metab. 31, 640-647 (2011)-   15. Andres, R. H. et al. Human neural stem cells enhance structural    plasticity and axonal transport in the ischaemic brain. Brain. 134,    1777-1789 (2011)-   16. Liu, Z. et al. Bone marrow stromal cells promote skilled motor    recovery and enhance contralesional axonal connections after    ischemic stroke in adult mice. Stroke 42, 740-744 (2011)-   17. Mazzocchi-Jones, D. et al. Embryonic striatal grafts restore    bi-directional synaptic plasticity in a rodent model of Huntington's    disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 30, 2134-2142 (2009)-   18. Lee, H. S. et al. Foxa2 and Nurr1 synergistically yield A9    nigral dopamine neurons exhibiting improved differentiation,    function, and cell survival. Stem Cells 28, 501-512 (2010)-   19. Hargus, G. et al. Differentiated Parkinson patient-derived    induced pluripotent stem cells grow in the adult rodent brain and    reduce motor asymmetry in Parkinsonian rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.    U.S.A. 107, 15921-15926 (2010)-   20. Yasuda, A. et al. Significance of remyelination by neural    stem/progenitor cells transplanted into the injured spinal cord.    Stem Cells. 29, 1983-1994 (2011)-   21. Mezey, E. The therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived stem    cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 112, 2683-2687 (2011)-   22. Sanai, N. et al. Corridors of migrating neurons in the human    brain and their decline during infancy. Nature 478, 382-386 (2011)-   23. Carlén, M. et al. Forebrain ependymal cells are Notch-dependent    and generate neuroblasts and astrocytes after stroke. Nat. Neurosci.    12, 259-267 (2009)-   24. Robel, S. et al. The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from    reactive gliosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 88-104 (2011)-   25. Seol, H. J. et al. Genetically engineered human neural stem    cells with rabbit carboxyl esterase can target brain metastasis from    breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 311, 152-159 (2011)-   26. Yasuhara, T. et al. Notch-induced rat and human bone marrow    stromal cell grafts reduce ischemic cell loss and ameliorate    behavioral deficits in chronic stroke animals. Stem Cells Dev. 18,    1501-1514 (2009)-   27. Pollock, K. et al. A conditionally immortal clonal stem cell    line form human cortical neuroepithelium for the treatment of    ischemic stroke. Exp. Neurol. 199, 143-155 (2006)-   28. Dezawa, M. et al. Specific induction of neuronal cells from bone    marrow stromal cells and application for autologous transplantation.    J Clin Invest. 113, 1701-10 (2004)-   29. Zhao, B. Q., Tejima, E., Lo, E. H. Neurovascular proteases in    brain injury, hemorrhage and remodeling after stroke. Stroke. 38,    748-752 (2007)-   30. Zhao, B. Q. et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in delayed    cortical responses after stroke. Nat. Med. 12, 441-445 (2006)

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for treating traumatic brain injury in asubject, the method comprising administering, to the brain of thesubject, a therapeutically effective amount of SB623 cells, wherein theSB623 cells are obtained by (a) providing a culture of marrow adherentstem cells (MSCs), (b) contacting the cell culture of step (a) with apolynucleotide comprising sequences encoding a Notch intracellulardomain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotide does not encode a full-lengthNotch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise the polynucleotide ofstep (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cells of step (c) inthe absence of selection.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the subjectis a human.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the MSCs are obtained froma human.
 4. Cells for transplantation into a subject for the treatmentof traumatic brain injury, wherein said cells are obtained by a processcomprising the steps of: (a) providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contactingthe cell culture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprising sequencesencoding a NICD wherein said polynucleotide does not encode afull-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise thepolynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cellsof step (c) in the absence of selection.
 5. The cells of claim 4,wherein the subject is a human.
 6. The cells of claim 4, wherein theMSCs are obtained from a human.
 7. A method for inducing the migrationof endogenous neurogenic cells from a neurogenic niche to a site ofbrain injury, the method comprising administering, to the brain of asubject, a therapeutically effective amount of SB623 cells, wherein theSB623 cells are obtained by (a) providing a culture of MSCs, (b)contacting the cell culture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprisingsequences encoding a Notch intracellular domain (NICD) wherein saidpolynucleotide does not encode a full-length Notch protein, (c)selecting cells that comprise the polynucleotide of step (b), and (d)further culturing the selected cells of step (c) in the absence ofselection.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the neurogenic niche is thesubventricular zone.
 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the brain injuryis a traumatic brain injury.
 10. The method of claim 7, wherein thesubject is a human.
 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.
 12. A method for stimulating proliferation ofneurogenic cells in a subject, the method comprising administering, tothe brain of a subject, a therapeutically effective amount of SB623cells, wherein the SB623 cells are obtained by (a) providing a cultureof MSCs, (b) contacting the cell culture of step (a) with apolynucleotide comprising sequences encoding a Notch intracellulardomain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotide does not encode a full-lengthNotch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprise the polynucleotide ofstep (b), and (d) further culturing the selected cells of step (c) inthe absence of selection.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the braininjury is a traumatic brain injury.
 14. The method of claim 12, whereinthe subject is a human.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the MSCs areobtained from a human.
 16. A method for inducing neurogenic cells toproliferate and migrate to a site of brain injury in a subject, themethod comprising administering, to the brain of a subject, atherapeutically effective amount of SB623 cells, wherein the SB623 cellsare obtained by (a) providing a culture of MSCs, (b) contacting the cellculture of step (a) with a polynucleotide comprising sequences encodinga Notch intracellular domain (NICD) wherein said polynucleotide does notencode a full-length Notch protein, (c) selecting cells that comprisethe polynucleotide of step (b), and (d) further culturing the selectedcells of step (c) in the absence of selection.
 17. The method of claim16, wherein the brain injury is a traumatic brain injury.
 18. The methodof claim 16, wherein the subject is a human.
 19. The method of claim 16,wherein the MSCs are obtained from a human.